School administrators’ views on effective school development: A case study
Abstract views: 3
/ 
PDF downloads: 0
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18094330Keywords:
Effective school, school administrator, case studyAbstract
In this study, the aim was to identify the views of school principals in public schools in Muratpasa in Antalya regarding the concept of an effective school and to analyze their opinions on effective school development. Based on a qualitative research design, it was conducted using a holistic multiple-case study approach. Individual interviews were used as the data collection technique and descriptive analysis was employed to analyze the collected data. According to the findings, most school administrators were familiar with the concept of effectiveness; however, they tended to perceive it more as social events. The most significant characteristics of effective schools were emphasized as the quality of educational services and the sensitivity toward school climate and culture. It was highlighted that each school should have its own unique mission and vision. The importance of flexible discipline and the role of punishment and reward were emphasized with the necessity for effective schools to move beyond routine behaviors and provide students with diverse learning environments. Motivation plays a crucial role in meeting different expectations and positive reinforcement is achievable through positive communication. Finally, the school administrators indicated that the greatest barrier to becoming an effective school is the lack of supervision.
References
Açıkalın, P. (1998). Üç Rakamlı Yıldönümlerine Doğru Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi [Educational administration in theory and practice toward three-digit anniversaries].
Aydın, M. (2002). Dinler Tarihine Giriş [Introduction to the history of religions]. Konya.
Balcı, A. (1993). Etkili Okul: Kuram Uygulama ve Araştırma [Effective school: Theory, practice, and research]. Ankara: Erek Ofset Matbaası.
Balcı, A. (2001). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma [Research in social sciences]. Ankara: PegemA Publishing.
Başaran, İ. E. (1982). Örgütsel Davranışın Yönetimi [Management of organizational behavior]. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Yayınları.
Başaran, İ. E. (2000). Eğitim Yönetimi [Educational administration]. Ankara: Yargıcı Matbaası.
Baştepe, İ. (2004). Etkili Okul ve Nitelikleri [Effective school and its characteristics]. Çağdaş Eğitim Dergisi, 29(315).
Baştepe, İ. (2009). Etkili okulun eğitim-öğretim süreci ve ortamı boyutlarının nitelikleri [Characteristics of instructional processes and environments of effective schools]. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 29.
Celep, C. (2000). Eğitimde Örgütsel Adanma ve Öğretmenler [Organizational commitment in education and teachers]. Ankara: Anı Publishing.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education. London & New York: Routledge Falmer.
Creswell, J. W. (2018). Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri: Beş Yaklaşıma Göre Nitel Araştırma ve Araştırma Deseni [Qualitative inquiry & research design: Five approaches] (M. Bütün & S. Demir, Eds.). Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi.
Çelik, V. (2002). Eğitim yönetici yetiştirme programına yön veren temel eğilimler [Basic tendencies guiding educational administrator training programs]. In 21. Yüzyıl Eğitim Yöneticilerinin Yetiştirilmesi Sempozyumu. Ankara.
Çokluk, Ö., & Şekercioğlu, G. (2014). Araştırma yöntemleri: Yeni başlayanlar için adım adım araştırma rehberi [Research methods: A step-by-step guide for beginners].
Edmonds, R. (1979). Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership, 15–24.
Girmen, Z., & Çalık, T. (2006). Ortaöğretim kurumlarının etkili okul özelliklerine sahip olma düzeyleri [The level of secondary schools possessing effective school characteristics]. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi.
Glass, T. E., Bjork, L. & G. Brunner, C. C. (1992). The 1992 Study of the American School Superintendency: America's Education Leaders in a Time of Reform. American Association of School Administrators.
Gunbayi, I., & Sorm, S. (2018). Social paradigms in guiding social research design: The functional, interpretive, radical humanist and radical structural paradigms. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 9(2), 57–76.
Gunbayi, I. (2023). Data analysis in qualitative research. Journal of Action Qualitative & Mixed Methods Research, 2(2), 1–11.
Gunbayi, I. (2024). Rigor in qualitative research. Journal of Action Qualitative & Mixed Methods Research, 3(2), 1–7.
Gündüz, Y., & Balyer, A. (2012). An investigation of the effective leadership behaviors of school principals. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 237–253.
Helvacı, F., & Koçak, M. (2011). Okul yöneticilerinin etkililiği: Uşak ili örneği [Effectiveness of school administrators: Uşak case]. Eğitim Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 33–55.
Hoy, W., & Ferguson, J. (1985). A theoretical framework and exploration of organizational effectiveness of schools. Educational Administration Quarterly.
Kahn, R. L., & Katz, D. (1978). The Social Psychology of Organizations. New York: Wiley.
Kalem, M., & Bakay, G. (2009). Türk eğitim sistemi ve etkili okul göstergeleri [Turkish education system and effective school indicators]. Project Based School Management, Project No. 142320-LLP-1-2008-1-TR-COMENIUS-CMP.
Karatepe, S. (2005). Yönetsel etkililik: Okul yönetiminde yönetsel etkililiğin astlarla ilişkiler boyutu [Managerial effectiveness in school management: Subordinate relations dimension]. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 307–326.
Kemal, K., & Karip, E. (1996). Etkili eğitim sistemlerinin geliştirilmesi [Developing effective educational systems]. Eğitim Yönetimi.
Lezotte, W. (1991). School improvement based on effective schools research. Educational Considerations, 18.
Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Merriam, S. B. (2013). Nitel Araştırma: Desen ve Uygulama İçin Bir Rehber [Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation] (S. Turan, Trans.). Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, J. E. (2015). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Miskel, C., & Hoy, W. (1996). Educational Administration: Theory, Research, and Practice. New York: Random House.
Özdemir, S. (2000). Eğitimde Örgütsel Yenileşme [Organizational innovation in education]. Ankara: PegemA Publishing.
Palys, T. (2008). Purposive sampling. In L. M. Given (Ed.) The SageEncyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. (Vol.2). Sage: Los Angeles, pp. 697-8.
Patton, M. Q. (2018). Nitel Araştırma ve Değerlendirme Yöntemleri [Qualitative research and evaluation methods] (M. Bütün & S. Demir, Eds.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Peters, T., & Waterman, R. (1987). Yönetme ve Yükselme Sanatı: “Mükemmeli Arayış” [In search of excellence] (S. Sargut, Trans.). İstanbul: Altın Kitaplar.
Polatcan, M., & Cansoy, R. (2017). Türkiye’de etkili okul araştırmaları: Ampirik araştırmaların analizi [Effective school studies in Turkey: An analysis of empirical research]. Özgün Araştırma.
Polk, J. A. (2006). Traits of effective teachers. ERIC, EJ744411.
Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2012). Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data. Los Angeles: Sage.
Şişman, M. (1996). Etkili Okul Yönetimi [Effective school management]. Eskişehir.
Şişman, M. (2002). Eğitimde Mükemmellik Arayışı [The quest for excellence in education]. Ankara.
Turhan, M., Şener, G., & Gündüzalp, S. (2017). Türkiye’de okul etkililiği araştırmalarına genel bir bakış [A general overview of school effectiveness studies in Turkey]. Turkish Journal of Educational Studies, 129–135.
Yin, R. (1984). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. California: Sage.
Yin, R. K. (2017). Durum Çalısması Arastırması Uygulamaları [Applications of Case Study Research]. (Translated by Gunbayi Ilhan). Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
Zigarelli, M. (1996). An empirical test of conclusions from effective schools research. Journal of Educational Research, 90, 103–111.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Action Qualitative & Mixed Methods Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The journal is licensed under a 